Should a celebrity condemn publicly?

Absolutely YES, but why?  A celebrity is a celebrity not because, (s)he is best in their field, but due to their social responsibility. For being best in their field, they are already, recognised with awards and paid heavily. Celebrity is a recognition (in other words responsibility) given by the public, thats the reason, a celebrities private life is less compared to their public life. Moreover, the atrocities around us, is not because of bad people, but due to the silence of the good. Given that, for any atrocity one has to condemn and reject it immediately and publicly, immaterial off celebrity status. And for a celebrity it becomes a primary responsibility.

Why someone is not condemning publicly?
Fear. This could be fear of losing livelihood, losing popularity or losing status. In general Dishonest, when some one is not honest they cannot condemn publicly. To condemn, one has to be honest. Reserving comments on such atrocities, reveals their insecurity.

Can someone condemn privately? 
May be, on certain situations, that too when things are personal or restricted to a closed group, condemning can be  private, again not always. Say for an example, if I found my son doing shoplifting, I can condemn him privately but should respond immediately and publicly, means,  either keep the shoplifted product back or pay for the product. Once back home condemn him for the act. Contrarily, If I choose to keep blindfolded, after reaching home, condemning him is more or less like supporting him for the act, as it is not a punishment to him but will act as an encouragement, as he gets the product and as a bonus no intimidation in public. Intimidation in public is good though modern psychologists differ from me, however stats prove that modern psychologists ideology has failed to give better society and citizen. As we see increase in crimes in society, including minors, where ethics and morals were completely ignored.

Another example, Ilayaraja (Celebrity) corrected (condemned) his daughter Bavadharini on a stage show, where he had choice to do that privately, but he chose to do it publicly on the stage. 

If we don't condemn a terror act publicly, we are actually supporting the act by not providing enough resistance, and sugar coated condemns are direct support for such acts. Especially when sugar coated words like hasty, brainwashed, misguided youth and all is used. As these acts are well planned, meticulously executed, guided to the perfection, which need to be condemned publicly, in-fact should be punished immediately


For morons (I tried not be abusive, but it will injustice for Martys), who say Army personnel are to die, is not just a vicious statement but treachery. Army personnel are not meant to die, they are for our protection, they are in the first row to sacrifice their lives before our turn to lose. They are sacrificing their lives and comfortableness for our safety and happiness.Hence, asking for retaliation or revenge for them, is not an emotional ask, is out of devotion towards them.  Snake-lets who ask to restrict such comments to IPL and should be ostracised from public forms. Rather adding values to the society their views are damaging the social values. One should be precautious about them.

As a public we can ask for revenge, but ideally it is government decision, only government knows the consequences, a government should not indulge in more damage for peoples expectation at the same time public views or expressions should not be restricted either. Snake-lets and paid media (presstitues and Urban Naxals) are painting such people as emotional and war mongering demons, which is condemnable. These people who stood for dissent once are against now, when general public are dissenting their views they change their side to bigotry.

Ultimacy on anything is not good, ultimate liberty is not a boon but a disguised curse, freedom of expression or freedom of speech should have a check, ultimacy in it, will lead to disaster, good will use it wisely, but bad, will only misuse it and we have those consequences, all around us.

Finally, all sweet talks like "Eye for an Eye will make the whole world blind" is all good, however "Peace for an eye will make the whole world dead" better to be blind, to be dead. Not condemning or sugarcoated condemning is nothing but a indirect support. One has to condemn, but should choose correct emotions and words based on their social status as that shows their maturity, knowledge and responsibility. Above all their credibility and honesty.

Thugs of Bollywood (Hindustan)

It was supposed to be a fiction movie about historical events in Hindustan before Independence. However it turned out to be hypocritical movie with vicious plot. It is movie which talks about freedom fighters fighting against atrocities and dictatorship of Britishers, the sarcastic thing is,  freedom fighters in the movie were doing the same atrocities and implementing their dictatorship in Hindustan before Britishers.

Hindustan requires Azadi from both Mughal and British rulers, however in Movie it was shown as if Britishers are bad (not for long) and Mughals were/are good. By the end of the movie, it says even Britishers are good, but Hindustanis are bad and untrustworthy. It was trying to paint that Mughals fought for Independence, and process got delayed because of Hindustanis who are dishonest and greed. Ignoring the fact that Mughals were barbaric and unleashed their wickedness and cruelty against Hindustanis, they were been lauded as saviours and warriors in this Movie. The dacoits were painted as freedom fighters, which resembles the Yakub Menon and Afzul Guru who were adulated as martyrs.

Movie is conspires to spread, that dacoits are not actually a dacoits but saviours, who lost their lives for the wellness of this country, and the same pattern is copied to the present day situation, to make terrorists as martyrs. No much explanation is required when ones reasoning capability registers a particular sect as martyrs even when they actually see them as miscreants, psychologically we ourself will try to correct the judgement based on the past events. In the past history says they are dacoits and robbers but movie corrects it conveying convincingly that they are freedom fighters and saviours. 

This pattern, corrects the current dacoits and rioters are not actually what they are, but a misguided or twisted events and brain starts implementing its imagination in the process of correcting the event, based on the movie experience, and on top of it, will build logical arguments to support that imaginative correctness, finally will end up believing this imaginative correction as actual and actual as twisted event. It is like PhotoCopy becoming original and original becoming first copy.

It is so smoothly done, that one will never know that they are getting controlled or influenced by the movie, when they are actually. It can be explained with an example about mind reading. Often on the streets we can see Street Magicians who claim they can read minds. They stop a person and ask to think a number and secretly write in a piece of paper, till now it looks like the person who was asked to think about a number is independent and not influenced by any one. The person hands over the paper in hiding fashion to another person. So till now no one knows what is the number except the person who wrote it. Now all of sudden Magician reveals his skin, which has a tattoo (for real). What a surprise, the tattoo happens to be the same number wrote by the person. Bingo!!! Magic is it? 

But actually it is not Magic, but psychology, when magician asked the person to think and write about a number, he is actually persuading the person to think and write the same number which he already tattooed. Which he indirectly communicates to the person, for ex, Assume Magician has tattooed number 5,  while communicating to the person, he will open his palm to reveal number 5, he will use sentences, about 5, like it is 5 PM, pleasant/sultry evening. It is 5th cross street and so on and on. Influencing the person.  One who is good at it is a good magician.

Post this Magic, even if Magician reveals the the person that he was influenced by him, the person will not accept, as the pride will never allow that he was controlled by other person. Similarly, the so called Liberals public, think they are independent thinkers but actually they are nothing Robots who are influenced by pesudo intellectuals, making them as living Artificial Intelligence beings

The Beef Story

In amidst chaos about beef eating and banning, it has become necessary than requirement to understand the story behind the beef and its origin.  Beef was never a food for Muslims or Christians, as they never knew cows, until they reached India (or Bharata Kanda as it was known earlier, For those who claim India never existed before 70+ years, even TN/AP/Kerala or any state never existed 50+ years ago.). For Sanathana Dharma (aka Hindu) meat (including Chicken/ Mutton or fish) was never a stable food, and when they decide to eat they eat every thing from animal meat to human meat (even now Aghoris eat human flesh and even in Mahabharata, Pandu insisted his sons to eat his carcass, however only Sahadev had a morsel of his father’s corpse) So Beef eating was not against Hinduism or even Buddhism,  as Buddha didn't banned/prohibited cow slaughter (there is a difference between food and meat).

History says when Ashoka converted to Buddhism, he didn’t banned beef or any meat in his kitchen but the consumption has been reduced drastically, Hindu Dharama always believed and believes killing for food is never a sin, and “Annam Para-Bharama sorupaam” means food is god.  Now the question is, how then all of sudden for Muslims or Christians or even Hindus beef become a staple food?. And banning the same is injustice?

It all started during Mughal/Arab invasion, to be precisely when they started to rule. As long as they were looters India never had any issues except the loss of wealth, human lives (especially men) and women as their courtesans. The day they started ruling us, it was minority vs majority issue, Majority of Hindus were under the control of few Nawabs, and these Nawabs had fear that they can be over thrown any time by Hindus, Nawabs want to shift there fear to Hindus, and they know few options as well. Later realized beating/killing or torturing them is not going to help Nawabs in long run as they either trigger revolution or they end up ruling no mans land.  Nawabs required a way to show Hindus what is their place is, and that is disturbing their beliefs and questioning their worship. As they observed that Hindus worship Cow, by eating Cow (beef) they thought they can create fear mongering in the minds of Hindus, "if I can eat your god think about yourself" is the question Nawabs want every Hindus to fear about, which also helped them in doing conversions as they boast that your god is helpless and is unable to save herself, how she is going to protect you (This was later used by Periyar in one of his speech against Hinduism) from there, Islam started to flourish in India. 

On seeing results Islamic invaders unleashed the beast in them, massive cow and ox slaughtering across their region, this has created yet another problem, excessive beef. Beef now slowly started becoming stable food for Nawabs, but still there is no demand for beef as those who converted to Islam from Hinduism never liked meat to be in their plate around the year. Nawabs started forcing converted to eat meat rather veggies and fruits with the help of Quran and Mullas, and for those who are non-muslims spl taxes were levied  for not consuming beef, to avoid taxes Hindus (those who cannot afford) started taking beef in to their day-to-day meals. From once in a blue moon meal beef was upgraded to day-to-day meal.

Beef was used as tool by Islamic rulers to offend the sentiments of the Hindus, it is not just a food, it was fear-mongering catalyst to surpass the Hindus and their believes. It is not just Muslims, Christians did the same in North America (REF Links given below), to  destroy livelihood of natives and to succumb them.

In secular country if I’m not allowed to have a Pork shop in Muslim majority area, as it offends their sentiments, similarly cow slaughtering should be banned as well, in Hindu majority country.

Moreover, Cow is not just an animal, it is livelihood and economy of the people here, Indian was at the top of world economy in GDP terms till it was rearing cows, the slaughtering of them has done unrecoverable damage.

'Kill Every Buffalo You Can! Every Buffalo Dead Is an Indian Gone' 

Was the tactics used by Christians to destroy Native Americans (Red Indians) and that is true as well.

And for those who spread false news that India stands first in Beef exports, India exports Buffalo meant and not Cow meat. Comparing both is like comparing lust and love.

REF:
https://newsmaven.io/indiancountrytoday/archive/genocide-by-other-means-u-s-army-slaughtered-buffalo-in-plains-indian-wars-nEWiK2AZik-yWbnFLXOqfw/
https://www.theatlantic.com/national/archive/2016/05/the-buffalo-killers/482349/

-->

Knowing the Unknown

There is uproar on BBC documentary earlier uproar was about the incident. As if it is first and foremost incident, forgetting the fact that it is in fact occurs every second across the globe. My concern is not for this uproar but for those who are victimized and left unknown. As Bible Quotes Luke Chapter 15, the Parable of Lost Sheep. Where the sadness of lost sheep is much greater than holding 99 of them. As told in Gita in fact the very birth of Gita is the outcome of disrespect to women.

Why BBC is so concerned about Indian Daughter? As if they have eradicated the rapes in their country? Why the world is so concerned about Indian Daughters? As if they have given liberty to their daughters, they are the one who prohibit their daughter to drive, to vote, to participate in politics and even to study (Malala, any ways her story is another controversy).

Every person in this world has controversy, Gandhi has Controversy, Hitler has Controversy, Nehru, Nelson Mandela (Gandhi of Africa) has controversies and even Mother Teresa has controversies. These controversies are because of overwhelmingly smart people, who can seed their thoughts into our minds, something like in the movie Inception. They can even make Jesus as mascot for Adultery and promote.

Who are those? What is there intention? Why they have to do this?...

What is the intention behind this super smart group, fooling us? What do they achieve? Money? Which they already have abundantly, Power? With the money they have they can be bend any law. It is definitely not for fun, It is well planned spider web conspiracy, so no kidding. What is there intention? There are super smart that is the intention? They want to be in that super smart floor forever, there are two ways to achieve this, 1) Improve smartness 2) Deteriorate opponent’s.

The obvious easiest way is deteriorating opponent’s intelligence, and it has been so wisely planned to carry to next generation, now it is become a genetical disorder. How? Lets take a simple example of school admission, instead of checking the credibility of the board of directors, teaching methodology, teachers and all. We are concern to check the richness of the school, infrastructure and amenities. Any thing less on this we will not admit. In fact we are forced not to admit due to peer pressure, social status so on. To get admission into such schools we pay through our nose. It is applicable in every aspects of the life, to buy a home, to buy a ride, to even buy it has now become a fashion to say Organic food. The sarcastic thing is food is supposed to be Organic...

We are tuned to believe the myths, and proclaim the facts as unreal. We are living in such a mysterious world that we are scared of everything, we are so scared we don’t use our common sense to validate how a simple pencil scratch can be fatal, a simple video with minimal graphics which explains bacteria evolving into a monstrous disease, that’s all they have to do, we will start filling their vault for them to spend on another prank on us for refill. 

They killed our senses, reasoning power to understand what is real and what is not, to know what is good or bad.  A rape scene going viral on Internet, a suicidal note getting 1000 likes in Facebook, some idiot claiming he is messiah for all good things will viral and we do share or like or post comments on such posts and feel proud for doing our part. We are tuned to ignore posts that are against such things. It’s the mass that decides what is good and what is wrong and that’s the reason why conversion is a huge business even though no immediate returns. To be discussed..

Modi Vs Riots

Where ever I hear of Modi’s name, there is always a tail attached to it, and that is 2002 riots in Gujarat. I’m not sure is it Massacre or Genocide or just Riot which turned to be bloody. Every news I read on that is little over spicy and exaggeration on both sides claiming him innocent and master mind behind the scenes. I know there were many riots in India before 2002, out of which 1984 Delhi riot was majorly spoken, at the top of my head I say that is much larger and bloody than 2002.

But why only 2002 riots are still in headlines even after a decade? Is this the only communal riot? Or is this the only atrocities against the minority? What made 2002 riots ever green? Or in other words who made it ever green? Before we answer this question let’s try to understand the riots before that, its intensities and characteristics.

RIOT  1: 1947 Communal riots in Bengal around 5000-10000 were killed during the regime of Congress

RIOT  2: 1969 Communal riots in Ahmedabad, more than 512 Killed in the city and 3000 to 15000 range in the entire state of Gujarat over a span 6 months during Congress regime

RIOT  3: Oct 1984 Communal riots in Delhi source say little over 2000 where Killed (Almost all are Sikhs) during Congress rule, which makes this a Rajiv Gandhi led genocide on India's minorities.

RIOT  4: Feb 1983 Communal violence in Nellie, Assam where 2000-5000 killed during Indira Gandhi (Congress party) regime, can be termed as India's worst slaughter of Muslims (minority) in any single riot (just 6 HOURS)

RIOT  5: 1964 Communal riots in Rourkela & Jamshedpur where little over 2000 Killed  under Congress regime

RIOT  6: August 1980 Moradabad Communal riots close to 2000 killed during Congress regime again

RIOT  7: October 1989  Bhagalpur, Bihar riots where 800 to 2000 killed during Congress regime.

RIOT  8: Dec 1992 - Jan 1993 Mumbai, Maharashtra riots where 800 to 2000 killed during Congress rule

 RIOT  9: April 1985 Communal riots in Ahmedabad, Gujarat at least 300 Killed under Congress regime

 RIOT 10: Dec 1992 Aligarh, UP at least 176 killed during party Congress rule (President's rule)

 RIOT 11: December 1992 Surat, Gujarat at least 175 killed during party Congress

 RIOT 12: December 1990 Hyderabad, AP at least 132 killed Congress was in power

 RIOT 13: August 1967 200 Killed in Communal riots Ranchi, under Congress Regime

 RIOT 14: April 1979, Communal riots in Jamshedpur, West Bengal where more than 125 killed during CPIM (Communist Party) regime

RIOT 15: 1970 Bhiwandi communal riots in Maharashtra around 80 killed during Congress rule

RIOT 16: May 1984 Communal riots in Bhiwandi 146 Killed, 611 Injured during Congress regime

RIOT 17: Apr-May 1987 Communal violence in Meerut, UP where 81 killed during Congress regime

RIOT 18: July 1986 Communal violence in Ahmedabad, Gujarat where 59 Killed Ruling party Congress

*Authenticity need to be verified

Given the above statistics (to my surprise never in my dreams I thought there will be this many), it is very much clear, Gujarat is such a state where Communal violence is high, and 95% of riots where during Congress rule, why are we so obsessed with Just 2002 riots? Most of the riots are against minorities (esp Muslims) but still 2002 gets more precedence, but why? Why Media is behind only with 2002 riots?

Is the Lack of control over Media by BJP could be the cause? I still don’t understand one thing is this a problem with riots or with Modi? 

I'm not trying to justify 2002? My question is why only 2002?

REF: http://www.firstpost.com/india/not-just-modi-guide-to-communal-riots-before-2002-and-after-688714.html

2012 Apocalypse

What a relief, earth survived post 21 Dec 2012, proving apocalypse wrong, does it? From where did this prediction born, why it was given so much importance? We all know it is from Mayan’s calendar, why this 21^st century civilization is so concerned about something which was written by civilization lived nearly 5000 yrs ago? Are we not more advanced than them both on technology and culture? (I leave the answer for this question to the readers as there are plenty of articles in web) But still, from NASA to common man, every one feared this to their level of intelligence and belief. There were several TV interviews on which even NASA was unable to nullify this and said there might be some radioactive waves from sun which might affect radio (TV, Mobile and all) signals. However I haven't heard of any such things neither on 21^st nor post 21^st.

Are we now safe from this Apocalypse? Scientists still debate on this, but what kind of debate is this? Do we understand the apocalypse that predicted? It is scientifically proved and accepted that Mayans are highly intelligent and possessed cutting edge technology that doesn't belong to their era. If so then how come they predict so foolishly that earth will burn out in one day, as if it formed in one day. It took millions of years for this planet to be eligible for living, another million of years for Homo sapiens to emerge further million years for humans, and we expect the earth to destroy in one day with no proper evidence. If expected Apocalypse is not a one day thing, then how many days it is for? What kind of apocalypse it is? Does it begin already? I believe it did begin already.

The apocalypse is not for humans, it is for humanity, where few are killing it and for the rest it doesn't make any sense any more, from social animal we fell as anti social element, killings over religion, shoot outs on kids, riots over race, many more across the globe and in India it is even worse, we don’t even have the basic social responsibility, neither at home nor on roads, we think it is our birth right to block the opposite side of the road, like shameless creature blocking the way for vehicles, I always wonder is there any law to book these idiots if patient dies in ambulance because of this blockage. We never put ourselves in the place of those in ambulance.

We litter, spit on streets, not showing any concern on our fellow person who walks bare foot (some because of poverty, some for religious reasons) how disgusting it would be for them. Driving while pedestrian crossing and many more, we even drive on foot paths hazarding pedestrians.  Recent atrocious over women, I’m not talking about the Delhi incident alone, 100+ victims in Bosnia war, 1000+ victims in Sri Lankan civil war, unknown number in Afghanistan war and many others around the world, per my knowledge only humans indulge in gang rapes, Where is humanity here?.

Illegal poaching, deforestation, global warming, the list becomes endless, our inhumane endangers humans and other species on this earth. Earth can survive without humans and it was for millions of years, and so the other species but humans cannot. We are dependent on this earth and its resources, and so on society, so it is not just enough we worry about global warming and climatic changes,   we should be more responsible to build a society filled with ethics and morals.  I don’t see this happening, every human lives like zombie may be he is not feeding on human, but on humanity. which is even worse. With human, just goes one life but with humanity the whole race. Apocalypse started it is good if we stop it, rather allowing it to find its end. 

An Apology to my Son

As I’m with my yet to be named Son, his giggling to my actions, responding to my voice, smiling to my gestures was so fun and happiest moments in my life, accidentally I touched the TV remote which turned on the TV with big sound, and there was news about removing hockey as our National game, all of sudden he stopped his giggling and smiling, ignoring me completely, turned his face away from me, all my funny faces and actions are vain. He is still in serious mood I thought it is TV sound that upsetted him, I turned off the TV, he is still serious, gazing wall this time.  Out of impatience I turned his face towards me forcibly he stared at me, one stare asking me thousand questions.

Questions for which I don’t have an answer but silence, his questions are below:

 What is my role in this society that I’m going to gift him, a society in which he will be forced to LIVE next? Is this society as caring and lovable as me? Is this a responsible society that I’m gifting?  At least is this a society that is safe to live?

I’m still in silence, this time his staring is so intense, and here comes the harsh question, why this punishment to me to LIVE in this society? This almost bought tears, and he continued “Am I been cheated thinking that you (me) are responsible when you (me) are not? “

A society which is infected with illicit educationalists, money launders media, corrupted leaders and worst of all irresponsible citizens. Students are getting terminated forcibly for not performing, is that a mistake of the student or the inability of the teacher or the irresponsibility of the society?  The first two are correctable and can only be corrected when society becomes responsible.  

Recent bus accident (I would rather call it murder), the concern school declared holiday to students and teachers for a week to avoid further commotion, however within two days they were reopened, when enquired it seems the parents has called the school management to open school, as it affects their daily work (both home and office), as kids are at home, how pathetic and irresponsible these parents are? Not caring for the fellow parent grief, no wonder they are not when they don’t care their kids.  How responsible these parents are by letting children to study in the same school that washed hands and pointed the contractor of the bus, feeling no sorry except through lips.  If building collapses and 10 children die, he will again say sorry and point the contractor who build it. And there are 1000 parents to let their kids study in that school. Management gets there money but parents? I often wonder that, how many parents know that kids are gift and not a sexual mistake.  When we are not cared for our children why to give birth?

 Recent Assam Violence, there were no highlights from media, where did they go? Did Cat (Congress) caught there tongue?  Why it is not splashed as Godhra riots (2002), I believe it is used as adjective whenever Modi is addressed as AIADMK adds “Minority” to DMK. Is Assam violence not a genocide? Who should answer this question? It is not the media or the leaders it is us, citizens, members of this society, but we don’t bother to answer questions, when we don’t bother to answer, then we lose the right to question, hence we don’t question the media or leaders who are left to act on their own.

Sensational news is what we all are concerned about, it is not the concern any more it has become need now, there is no point in blaming the media as we are demanding and expecting the same from media, there is no point in preaching the media to be responsible when we are not responsible, it is better to practice before we preach, sarcastically we preach but wont practice. When we stop watching such news channels then obviously they are forced to change, they cannot force us to watch but we can force them to change.   

Removing Hockey as national game is another shame, just because my father is not responsible or not performing his duties, should I be changing my father?  Or training him on how to perform his duties?  Probably I should change, that is what these incapable leaders are setting an example, again it is not the leaders fault, it is us who made them the leaders. Are the players blamable or the sports authority? If tomorrow the selected games (players) are not performing will be there a change in the national game again? If we keep changing the games will there be games left to choose?

 I feel as if I’m shot with all these questions from my son, I’m not bleeding, I’m not breathing either,  my silence is killing me and as a fuel to fire his silence is burying me alive, just then my wife entered as a silence (ice) breaker, asking us both “ what is going on between father and Son?”  My son just responded her with a smile and a look at me which just said “now my father is responsible”.