Politics n Urban Naxalism

To cheat someone, one has to create interest and implant trust in them. From Food to politics this is the trend. Say, doctor or popular personality talking about health facts of a product, creates interest in viewers mind and urges them to buy. Or create a disinterest on existing practice/product so that users will disown that practice/product and befriend with the new practice/item.

Example, for hand sanitizer, a person with doctor dress with stethoscope around neck, describes the micro-organisms/bacteria even in clean palms, modern technology helps in visualisation. Then he adds few drops of sanitizer, and confirms all micro-organisms are dead, which for sure we don't know, as neither see them with our naked eyes before nor after. The fear of micro-organisms and trust makes us to believe there was microorganisms earlier and it wasn't later. Now, we buy that product.

In India it is very successful trend, since 1940's. From Products to Practice to Politicians it is every where. The trust and interest that was created initially is key for forgiveness for all their past, present and future sins. Congress created such trust successfully and their corruptions (JEEP, BOFORS, COAL, 2G, National Herald, Augusta and so on ) were forgiven or ignored. Even AAP, created such interest, by taking advantage of Nirbhaya Case, LokPal agitation and all, gained trust, got power and they indulge in scandals. Communism (across the globe) created such interest by creating an illusion of workers protection, and took over the world so fast, then any practice or philosophy before.

How do they create this interest?
Creating interest is like investing time and money. Instigate scenario, project yourself as the honest, selfless, neutral and down to earth person. Politicians, project themselves as freedom fighters, protesting against injustice, talking about social injustice/inequalities, racism, gender inequality and all. With these activities they gain trust among the people. Once they gain that trustability, followers believe them blindly, then they don't have to talk trust worthy things, as what ever they speak becomes trust worthy. Ex. Congress gained trust by talking about gender equality, but pooh-poohed when PM gave opportunity to a female minister to defend her ministry. This oxymoron-ism  was never questioned by people, in fact they supported congress for such cheap act. Same with DMK, who talk about women empowerment and gender equality, insulted woman Defence Minister, as Pickle Aunty, just because she is a women. Which received no condemns neither from public nor from main stream media.

Media is altogether a different devil, under the hood of neutralism hides a venomous thongs, they strike so hard and fast, that,  before we realise that we are stuck, the venom would have completed its task. Let me give few examples, News7, does talk shows on Sterlite and all but will never spill a word about Sand Mafia and Minerals. Puthiyathalamurai, spoke volumes about pond and lake encroachment by various institutions but was completely blind folded on SRM institutes.

Freelance writers/activists are snake-lets, even though they are small they are as venomous as main stream media, they are dangerous then them as they don't know how to strike and when to strike, but they will keep striking. They gain popularity by projecting themselves as neutral, honest and equality in all aspects. Once they have enough followers all there rants are considered as preaches. They get power to make originals as fake and fakes as originals. As long as they retain the trust every word they utter will be a quote. They hide their intention and seek support for the same. T. Gandhi, Pyush M and all are best in this hide and seek play.

 Talking morals which are not practicable, they preach unquestionable humanity, unrestricted freedom and all. They ask to follow human rights to rapists but will behave like terrorists on those who stalks their daughters/sisters. They expect humanity towards terrorists but exercise extremism on those who damage (accidentally) their assets. Highly hypocritical!!!

Modi Vs Riots

Where ever I hear of Modi’s name, there is always a tail attached to it, and that is 2002 riots in Gujarat. I’m not sure is it Massacre or Genocide or just Riot which turned to be bloody. Every news I read on that is little over spicy and exaggeration on both sides claiming him innocent and master mind behind the scenes. I know there were many riots in India before 2002, out of which 1984 Delhi riot was majorly spoken, at the top of my head I say that is much larger and bloody than 2002.

But why only 2002 riots are still in headlines even after a decade? Is this the only communal riot? Or is this the only atrocities against the minority? What made 2002 riots ever green? Or in other words who made it ever green? Before we answer this question let’s try to understand the riots before that, its intensities and characteristics.

RIOT  1: 1947 Communal riots in Bengal around 5000-10000 were killed during the regime of Congress

RIOT  2: 1969 Communal riots in Ahmedabad, more than 512 Killed in the city and 3000 to 15000 range in the entire state of Gujarat over a span 6 months during Congress regime

RIOT  3: Oct 1984 Communal riots in Delhi source say little over 2000 where Killed (Almost all are Sikhs) during Congress rule, which makes this a Rajiv Gandhi led genocide on India's minorities.

RIOT  4: Feb 1983 Communal violence in Nellie, Assam where 2000-5000 killed during Indira Gandhi (Congress party) regime, can be termed as India's worst slaughter of Muslims (minority) in any single riot (just 6 HOURS)

RIOT  5: 1964 Communal riots in Rourkela & Jamshedpur where little over 2000 Killed  under Congress regime

RIOT  6: August 1980 Moradabad Communal riots close to 2000 killed during Congress regime again

RIOT  7: October 1989  Bhagalpur, Bihar riots where 800 to 2000 killed during Congress regime.

RIOT  8: Dec 1992 - Jan 1993 Mumbai, Maharashtra riots where 800 to 2000 killed during Congress rule

 RIOT  9: April 1985 Communal riots in Ahmedabad, Gujarat at least 300 Killed under Congress regime

 RIOT 10: Dec 1992 Aligarh, UP at least 176 killed during party Congress rule (President's rule)

 RIOT 11: December 1992 Surat, Gujarat at least 175 killed during party Congress

 RIOT 12: December 1990 Hyderabad, AP at least 132 killed Congress was in power

 RIOT 13: August 1967 200 Killed in Communal riots Ranchi, under Congress Regime

 RIOT 14: April 1979, Communal riots in Jamshedpur, West Bengal where more than 125 killed during CPIM (Communist Party) regime

RIOT 15: 1970 Bhiwandi communal riots in Maharashtra around 80 killed during Congress rule

RIOT 16: May 1984 Communal riots in Bhiwandi 146 Killed, 611 Injured during Congress regime

RIOT 17: Apr-May 1987 Communal violence in Meerut, UP where 81 killed during Congress regime

RIOT 18: July 1986 Communal violence in Ahmedabad, Gujarat where 59 Killed Ruling party Congress

*Authenticity need to be verified

Given the above statistics (to my surprise never in my dreams I thought there will be this many), it is very much clear, Gujarat is such a state where Communal violence is high, and 95% of riots where during Congress rule, why are we so obsessed with Just 2002 riots? Most of the riots are against minorities (esp Muslims) but still 2002 gets more precedence, but why? Why Media is behind only with 2002 riots?

Is the Lack of control over Media by BJP could be the cause? I still don’t understand one thing is this a problem with riots or with Modi? 

I'm not trying to justify 2002? My question is why only 2002?

REF: http://www.firstpost.com/india/not-just-modi-guide-to-communal-riots-before-2002-and-after-688714.html

Telagana – A Rampage

A tale reminisces me, there was a king who drew a line and asked his ministers to make that line shorter without erasing any part of the line, which puzzled the ministers, and finally one smart kid drew another line bigger than the one already there drew by the king. Its exactly what is happening with the Telagana issue, after the accident (I would rather call this as murder/assassination) of YSR Chief Minister of Andhra Pradesh, which was leading to rampage in the state and rejecting the candidature Jagan Mohan son of YSR, as the next chief minister of AP by the state congress, pothered central congress committee. They tried to elude the situation but didn’t last longer, finally one smart congress watch dog came up with an idea to create a bigger issue than these, and that is TELAGANA. I bet no one in AP including the close friends and relatives of YSR, who may or may not be in Congress, want to probe his death case now, but to get out of Telagana issue.

You might tend to ask me why they created bigger issue like Telagana rather solving the death case of YSR and accepting Jagan Mohan, Telagana might look bigger for community, definitely not for the party, it is same divide and rule policy of British which congress is still following, it is the far sight of Nehru family which divided states based on the languages so that there is always a tension and uneasiness between the states, this gives the more leverage to the central to intervene state affairs and disputes. Tamilians know about the Cauvery dispute for decades, and it will never be solved as long as it is there vote bank, since that is an appetizer for every election.

Gandhi divided countries based on Religion, Nehru divided country based on languages, and congress now dividing the states based on divisions, tomorrow it will be further divided based on the caste, creed and so on. I know the question in your mind how it benefits the congress, small states means more and more small political parties and this creates more and more friction between the state policies, and to reach the central the states has to come under one umbrella which is almost a mission impossible now. So it a biscuit thrown by the congress to feed the small political parties to gain powers in their respective state, and at, no time these small political parties can join together to form a central government, remember there are only two big national parties, Congress and BJP. BJP is getting out of show, because of non-secularism (neither congress a secular party) which BJP accepted (I mean indirectly) and congress didn’t. So it is always the congress which will own the Prime Minister seat, I know BJP is also encouraging this Telagana issue, but they will not get the lion share, which I believe BJP knows too.

Remember the congress which rejected Jagan Mohan’s candidature for CM based on age factor, is promoting Rahul son of Rajiv EX-PM, for PM candidature, and they don’t want the people of AP to question this so they have a given another question to raise that is Telagana, they just want to shut the AP’s mouth and not other states, since no state is going to raise their voice for AP, because of the friction and uneasiness with other states, which exactly congress is aiming at, and it is close to the accomplishment of that mission.

Its not the case only in AP, say in TamilNadu, when ever there is a Cauvery issue raised in public, you see government raising the Bus ticket fares or funding farmers to protest for crop price hike (only for this every party have there own unions), so the Cauvery issue is erased off from the people’s mind. Indians have amnesia, which these politicians take advantage off. If there is any national issue like peace talks with Pakistan, after 26/11 incident India taking a U-turn from its stand, when we (Indians) were agitated a little, government spread rumors of hiking fuel prices, now we are worried about the fuel price hike and not about the peace talks with Pakistan.

As long as we are suffering with this disorder (amnesia), we are the slaves for politicians, and if a politician is not taking advantage of this people’s disorder, he will be forgotten soon, like Lal Bhadhur shastri, Kamaraj – EX CM of TN and so on.

Profligate actions of Congress

Dating back to the independence of India, Congress led immoral leadership qualities but fortunately gained the support of the public to sustain all these 50 years. The seed has rooted itself so strong, that still Indians find hard to locate a moral leader to support, thou, they are then and there.

The divide and rule policy of the English men was well practiced by the Nehru family than by the inventor, India was well known for its communal harmony, and Nehru’s family hold the pride of converting this harmony into battles to war, for which we are paying the royalty till now. The first communal battle (as per as my knowledge) was started when Indira Nehru married Feroze Khan Son of Jehangir Khan, Where Mohandas Karam Chand Gandhi (Also Known as Mahatma Gandhi) suggested to change the last name of Feroze Khan from Khan to Gandhi as to avoid the resentment (virtual I should say) in India to bank the voters and to cheat the Indians. People who don’t have guts to say and reveal the truth cannot be a leaders and definitely not Mahatma's, they have artificially created a resentment between Hindus and Muslims dividing them forever from harmony, for their(Nehru and Gandhi) harmony and this Congress have succeeded till this second.

I say the resentment was artificially created because there are Hindu gods who had married Muslim girls and both Hindus and Muslims are aware of this and they worship those gods too, rather being hatred towards them, Hindus and Muslims were Bhai Bhai until Gandhi and Nehru started propagating that they are “Bhai Bhai”, and there intention is still paying well.

Another instance it was Indian National Congress (INC) which opened a Pandora’s Box and the door to hell in India which was followed by the Babri Masjid demolition in 1992, communal riots on a massive scale culminating in the 1993 Mumbai serial blasts. Before 1993 India was never struck by a communal bomb of this scale engineered by real politics and thus part of the credit must go to the Congress for lighting the fuse for all bombs till date exploding across Indian cities, mandirs and masjids.

It was the Congress Prime Minister Rajiv Gandhi Son of Feroze Khan who gave in to Hindu pressure and ordered the locks on the Babri Masjid in Ayodhya removed in 1986. Until then, a priest had been permitted to perform puja once a year for the idols installed there in 1949. The decision to fuel Babri Masjid Ram Janambhomi temple issue was taken by the Congress just one month after overruling the court’s decision in the infamous Shah Bano case in 1985 which was opposed tooth and nail by the then opposition right wing Hindus and the Left parties as Muslim appeasement by the Congress for vote bank consolidation. This shows that the party has swung from one ideological extreme to the other just to garner votes. This was running with the hares and hunting with the hounds.

And now the Amarnath Land Issue, According to Hindu’s belief, the cave was first discovered by a Muslim shepherded Buta Malik, and to date, I heard that a percentage of the income through the donations made by the pilgrims to the shrine was given to the descendants of the Malik, the yatra was so peaceful until in the beginning of the year 2000 where some Kashmiri militants where the death toll raised to 30 and in the subsequent years 2001 and 2002, 13 and 2 pilgrims were killed. Any which ways militants for that matter any where in the world never distinguished among religious places or educational institutions or medical facilities, let it be India or America or Afghanistan or Pakistan, they make no considerations except for the blood.

The call for a Bharat Bandh by BJP and VHP on July 3, 2008 over the Amarnath land dispute and the unfolding of the drama in the next few days in Indore, Jammu and other cities were just a beginning, wait and see, how many more lives and public properties will have to be destroyed in the years to come, thanks to India’s vote bank politics.

BJP has always been successfully manipulating majority sentiments over religious issues and yatras. Not to forget present BJP’s prime minister-in-waiting, Lal Krishna Advani’s ‘rath yatra’ in 1992 that ultimately took them to Delhi’s throne for the first time in 1996. The divisive propaganda is on to communalize the atmosphere over the land dispute so that J & K in particular, and India, in general, should remain simmering at least till the next general elections. The Amarnath land issue will reach the top position in BJP’s electoral agenda and the Congress will be a big loser once more. Once again the Congress will be hoist by its own petard.

Mufti Mohammad Saeed-led People's Democratic Party (PDP) that was part of the cabinet decision that allowed the transfer of land to the Shri Amarnath Shrine Board (SASB), decided to withdraw the support and blamed its coalition partner Congress for the whole mess. Murtaza Shibli, a Kashmiri, writes from London, “Only days ago, Kashmir’s Forest Minister, Qazi Mohammad Afzal who belongs to the PDP, openly boasted about his role in effecting the land transfer. But when the public reaction grew, the PDP not only withdrew support, but also issued public statements that sounded like racial epithets designed to inflame the public opinion and hence provoke and enlarge the constituency of protests and violence.”

Congress has sowed the immoral seed in the grounds of Kashmir, its geographical location has given better growing condition for this tree, unless and until the tree is uprooted completely, and Kashmir is totally under the control of Indian Government, as we cant afford to loose Kashmir any more as we are already loosing our control over Arunachal Pradesh to China, which I’ll be discussing in another topic.

We can’t allow our motherland to be strangled to pieces by our neighboring countries. As Indians it becomes our responsibility to know our rights and direct the leaders who are our servants and not masters as they behave now, to take decisions on there own, with no consideration on the people’s harmony, and every one of us need to educate at least one in our family to make them understand their responsibilities and rights. I believe if this has been taken has a pledge, the coming election will definitely be fruitful. Jai Hind.